Keyword summary
32% 29 analyzed articles/videos 16,821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ebola results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 8,502 hits . Analysis detected 60,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 89,724 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (34,186 of 35,686 keywords). This Ebola is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group. Ebola
Keyword details
Total words: 89,724
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score29 analyzed articles89.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst