Keyword summary
57% 16 analyzed articles/videos 15,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corecivic results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 5,449 hits . Analysis detected 46,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 64,877 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (35,419 of 37,536 keywords). This Corecivic is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Corecivic
Keyword details
Total words: 64,877
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score16 analyzed articles64.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst