Keyword summary
17% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canadian Wildfires results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Indoctrination , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,641 hits . Analysis detected 10,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,227 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,871 of 37,536 keywords). This Canadian Wildfires is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Canadian Wildfires
Keyword details
Total words: 17,227
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst