Vox50%

The dirtiest air in the world 59%

By Caitlin Dewey77%

7/16/2026, 9:20:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 972 faulty-reasoning hits from 544 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55% and a BS Rank of 59% (9,164 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the article peer group.

This story appeared in Today, Explained, a daily newsletter that helps you understand the most compelling news and stories of the day. 
Subscribe here. 
Canadian wildfire smoke is pouring over the US border today, blanketing much of the Northeast and Upper Midwest in fine particulate. 
When I went outside to water plants in Buffalo this morning, the air tasted like campfire and glowed with a faint amber haze. 
My colleague Zack Beauchamp, who lives in Ontario, said “the sky looked genuinely apocalyptic” in Toronto yesterday. 
The heavy smoke comes from both the hundreds of wildfires raging across Canada and a meteorological phenomenon known as a “heat dome,” which traps hot, smoky air close to the earth. 
Those conditions are expected to linger through Saturday, exposing more than 115 million people to dangerously polluted air. 
Stay indoors, if possible. 
(AC and air purifiers can help maintain your indoor air quality.) 
And if you must go outside, wear an N95 mask and avoid strenuous activity. 
The pollution success story everyone forgets 
Smoky, polluted summer weeks like this one still feel like outliers on the East Coast. 
But they were actually pretty common before the passage of the Clean Air Act 63 years ago. 
Pollution from cars, factories, and power plants had exploded in the boom years following World War II. 
Major US cities were routinely blanketed in falling ash, yellow smog, and a toxic “smaze”  that’s “smoke” + “haze”  that, during flare-ups, killed dozens of people. 
The Clean Air Act spurred early research into monitoring and control, however, and laid the groundwork for an ambitious federal regulatory system that set limits on polluters. 
Over the next 50 years, those efforts significantly slashed US air pollution and, according to some estimates, prevented hundreds of thousands of premature deaths. 
The effort was so successful, in fact, that many Americans no longer remember a time when cities like New York regularly looked like this. 
But the news here isn’t all good. 
After decades of progress, some air pollutants  like the fine particulate matter released by wildfires  have experienced year-to-year increases. 
And the politics of addressing climate change, which makes wildfires larger and more intense, are far thornier than the politics of cleaning up car tailpipes or smokestacks. 
One link for later 
 Today is a great day to buy a produce brush. 
(Online, obviously. 
Don’t go outside for one!) 
Cyclosporiasis, the explosive-diarrhea parasite, continues to wreak havoc on America’s bowels. 
And the best way to reduce your risk is by washing raw fruits, vegetables, and herbs under running water. 
Before you go… 
* Did you know…that “pins and needles” numbness you sometimes feel in your limbs isn’t caused by a lack of blood flow? 
It’s probably related to nerve compression, and for most of us, it’s pretty normal. 
* Today’s trivia: What’s an animal that can be as narrow as a few millimeters or as wide as 13 feet? 
(You can find this and other brain puzzles in Vox’s daily crossword. 
Look for the answer in tomorrow’s edition.) 
* Yesterday’s trivia: Yesterday we asked you to name a famous Indo-Caribbean wrap-style sandwich. 
That would be the roti, versions of which also exist in many Asian and African cooking traditions. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.5%Caitlin Dewey: 2.7%Vox: 4.5%Confirmation Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Caitlin Dewey: 4.7%Vox: 3.0%Availability Heuristic9.2%This article: 2.8%Caitlin Dewey: 1.2%Vox: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic2.8%This article: 3.1%Caitlin Dewey: 0.7%Vox: 1.4%Hindsight Bias3.1%This article: 6.1%Caitlin Dewey: 1.9%Vox: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 6.1%Caitlin Dewey: 7.6%Vox: 5.9%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 4.2%Caitlin Dewey: 0.3%Vox: 0.4%Loss Aversion4.2%This article: 5.0%Caitlin Dewey: 1.0%Vox: 0.4%Status Quo Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.4%Caitlin Dewey: 1.0%Vox: 2.0%Optimism Bias6.4%This article: 7.2%Caitlin Dewey: 1.8%Vox: 2.3%Pessimism Bias7.2%This article: 17.1%Caitlin Dewey: 8.5%Vox: 6.7%Negativity Bias17.1%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.9%Vox: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.8%Vox: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.2%Vox: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.2%Vox: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 1.0%Vox: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 2.7%Vox: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Caitlin Dewey: 2.6%Vox: 1.3%Recency Bias7.7%This article: 4.2%Caitlin Dewey: 1.0%Vox: 0.3%Primacy Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.6%Vox: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 3.1%Vox: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.0%Caitlin Dewey: 2.3%Vox: 2.0%False Dilemma5.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 1.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.0%Caitlin Dewey: 7.9%Vox: 6.2%Hasty Generalization7.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.2%Vox: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.6%Vox: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.1%Caitlin Dewey: 4.6%Vox: 3.9%Appeal to Emotion5.1%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.4%Vox: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.4%Caitlin Dewey: 2.0%Vox: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.4%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.2%Vox: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.5%Caitlin Dewey: 0.8%Vox: 0.5%Burden of Proof7.5%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.4%Vox: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.4%Caitlin Dewey: 4.2%Vox: 2.2%Anecdotal9.4%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.3%Caitlin Dewey: 3.4%Vox: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.3%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.1%Vox: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 4.1%Vox: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.1%Caitlin Dewey: 1.8%Vox: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 20.0%Caitlin Dewey: 15.8%Vox: 8.8%Biased Writer Voice20.0%This article: 7.7%Caitlin Dewey: 3.6%Vox: 1.6%Indoctrination7.7%This article: 5.0%Caitlin Dewey: 1.9%Vox: 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Dewey: 0.0%Vox: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Caitlin Dewey: 5.3%Vox: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.7%

544 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers5.3%attributed speech515writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageZack Beauchamp • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageVox • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Zack Beauchamp

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words59% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zack Beauchamp: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.2 ptsWriter: 21.2%Zack Beauchamp: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Zack Beauchamp: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%Zack Beauchamp: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%Zack Beauchamp: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.