Speaker summary
⁠74%3 analyzed articles/videos55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zack Beauchamp results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.6% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 238.113 faulty-reasoning hits from 55 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 38.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,308 of 28,364 speakers). This Zack Beauchamp is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Zack Beauchamp
Speaker details
Total words: 55
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
38.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos55 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 51.6%51.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.0%38.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.0%33.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 51.6%, sitewide 19.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos