Keyword summary
42% 21 analyzed articles/videos 8,263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boston results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 3,545 hits . Analysis detected 38,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,482 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (27,642 of 34,721 keywords). This Boston is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Boston
Keyword details
Total words: 41,482
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score21 analyzed articles41.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst