Author summary
64% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madyline Swearing results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 667 hits . Analysis detected 5,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,059 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,674 of 6,170 authors). This Madyline Swearing is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Madyline Swearing
Author details
Total words: 7,059
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst