Keyword summary
28% 9 analyzed articles/videos 914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alan Greenspan results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 2,984 hits . Analysis detected 27,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,968 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (34,101 of 35,668 keywords). This Alan Greenspan is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group. Alan Greenspan
Keyword details
Total words: 38,968
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles39K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst