Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ewen MacAskill results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hindsight Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 508 hits . Analysis detected 3,453 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Ewen MacAskill is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ewen MacAskill
Author details
Total words: 6,268
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.1% 8.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst