Keyword summary
58% 13 analyzed articles/videos 10,646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Afghanistan results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 5,079 hits . Analysis detected 50,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,375 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,254 of 37,536 keywords). This Afghanistan is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Afghanistan
Keyword details
Total words: 51,375
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score13 analyzed articles51.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst