Author summary
19%5 analyzed articles/videos3,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Corwin results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 4,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,671 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (7,910 of 8,958 authors). This Tom Corwin is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Tom Corwin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
12%Tom Corwin (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,671
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

12% percentile
025507510011.7% percentile
1.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate