West Nile virus outbreak declared in Pee Dee, most likely in Myrtle Beach 2%

By Tom Corwin19%

8/6/2026, 1:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Overconfidence Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 358 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,049 of 28,460 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the article peer group.

South Carolina public health officials declared an outbreak of mosquito-borne West Nile virus after two human cases were diagnosed in the Pee Dee region. 
North Carolina announced its first human case of the season the same day. 
The S.C. 
Department of Public Health said Aug. 5 there were two human cases diagnosed in the same geographic area of the Pee Dee in the same time frame, which shows the virus is circulating and fits the state’s criteria for declaring an outbreak. 
West Nile is not transmitted person-to-person, so two different infected mosquitoes bit those patients. 
To be declared an outbreak, the cases have to be diagnosed within 45 days of each other and within two to three miles, said Dr. 
Martha Buchanan, director of the Bureau of Communicable Disease Prevention and Control for public health. 
South Carolina has mosquito-borne disease cases every year so the announcements should not come as a surprise, said Dr. 
Helmut Albrecht, an infectious disease specialist with Prisma Health and the University of South Carolina. 
It's the time of year we would see them, he said. 
While it is important, it is not a reason to go overboard, Albrecht said. 
Don't ignore it. 
Don't panic, he said. 
We've got this. 
The recent rains should be a reminder for people to empty standing water in their yards, Buchanan said. 
Mosquitoes can lay eggs in the water that hatch in seven days, so emptying the water at least weekly helps interrupt the cycle and a new crop of the flying pests, she said. 
Using repellent with DEET can also deter bites that would spread disease, and wearing long sleeves and pants outside is always a good idea to ward off attacks. 
The Palmetto State typically sees five to 20 cases of West Nile a year and that is usually a confluence of factors, Buchanan said. 
This is a season where we see increased mosquito activity and increased human outside activity, she said. 
So that's a combination that is going to lend itself to cases of mosquito-borne illnesses that are endemic to South Carolina. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 2.0%Post and Courier: 1.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Tom Corwin: 1.2%Post and Courier: 2.3%Availability Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.0%Post and Courier: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.3%Post and Courier: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Tom Corwin: 0.8%Post and Courier: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.2%Post and Courier: 2.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.2%Post and Courier: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.3%Post and Courier: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.3%Post and Courier: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Tom Corwin: 3.8%Post and Courier: 3.0%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.1%Post and Courier: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 2.0%Post and Courier: 3.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.6%Post and Courier: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.1%Post and Courier: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.4%Post and Courier: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.0%Post and Courier: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.2%Post and Courier: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.2%Post and Courier: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.7%Post and Courier: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.0%Post and Courier: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.3%Post and Courier: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 2.1%Post and Courier: 1.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 2.8%Post and Courier: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.2%Post and Courier: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 4.7%Post and Courier: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.8%Post and Courier: 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.2%Post and Courier: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.1%Post and Courier: 0.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 1.6%Post and Courier: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.1%Tom Corwin: 0.8%Post and Courier: 0.3%Indoctrination1.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Corwin: 0.3%Post and Courier: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

358 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers74%attributed speech94writer words
Selected voice

Helmut Albrecht

58%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words26% of attributed speech0% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination+5.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Helmut Albrecht: 5.8%5.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.