Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 6,750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Goldbaum results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 1,704 hits . Analysis detected 12,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,416 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (5,992 of 6,138 authors). This Christina Goldbaum is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. Christina Goldbaum
Author details
Total words: 26,416
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.4% percentile 1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles26.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst