Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Guttenfelder results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,478 of 6,170 authors). This David Guttenfelder is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
David Guttenfelder
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
77%David Guttenfelder (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,752
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 7.8%7.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 8.7%8.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos