Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Chaayto results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 415 hits. Analysis detected 1,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,281 of 6,170 authors). This Sarah Chaayto is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Sarah Chaayto
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
63%Sarah Chaayto (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.4%15.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos