Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video5,494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Max Bearak results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 1,153 hits. Analysis detected 9,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (5,990 of 6,134 authors). This Max Bearak is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Max Bearak
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠3%Max Bearak (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 21,976
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751002.3% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles22K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos