Gothamist77%

MTA to move forward with Second Ave subway work, despite Trump's push to kill the project 0%

By Stephen Nessen66%

3/20/2026, 8:48:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 280 faulty-reasoning hits from 395 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

The MTA plans to move forward with a $1.1 billion contract to start digging and building a new train station at East 106th Street for the Second Avenue subway  despite a pending lawsuit the transit agency filed against the Trump administration over an order to halt funding for the megaproject. 
MTA officials said Friday they plan to bring the contract to the agency’s board for approval next week. 
It comes days after the authority claimed in its lawsuit that work on the subway extension “will eventually have to come to a screeching halt” if the federal government continues to withhold funding. 
Officials say they want to ensure no time is lost on the long-sought subway line while they wait for the lawsuit to play out in court. 
The agency plans to wait until a judge rules before finalizing the contract, but doesn’t want to have to go back to the MTA board for approval after the order comes down. 
The federal transportation department under former President Joe Biden agreed to cover $3.4 billion  or 44%  of the project’s estimated $7.7 billion price tag. 
The work aims to extend the Q train into East Harlem and build new stations at 106th and 110th streets before connecting the line to the 4, 5 and 6 lines at 125th Street and Lexington Avenue. 
The Trump administration halted funding from the grant in October, and the MTA’s lawsuit seeks to unlock nearly $60 million in payments the agency says are past due. 
“If funding does not resume soon, the MTA will be forced to further divert critical funding from other important transportation projects to cover the shortfall and ensure that the project remains on schedule,” the MTA wrote in the lawsuit. 
“This is unsustainable and the steady progress on Phase 2 will eventually have to come to a screeching halt.” 
The contract is the third of four contracts for the project. 
The MTA has already inked deals to relocate utilities and dig out the tunnel for the extension. 
The authority has one last contract for the project, which it hopes to put out for bid next year, and is still completing the designs for that work. 
The MTA plans for trains to begin running on the new line by 2032. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 3.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Stephen Nessen: 11.3%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 2.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Stephen Nessen: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.3%This article: 3.5%Stephen Nessen: 4.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias3.5%This article: 4.8%Stephen Nessen: 2.3%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 11.4%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.0%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 3.7%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 9.9%Stephen Nessen: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma9.9%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 1.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 3.7%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 23.0%Stephen Nessen: 8.6%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion23.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 3.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.1%Stephen Nessen: 3.6%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice4.1%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 10.6%Stephen Nessen: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Nessen: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

395 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker26%attributed speech293writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 39 words • 0.0% coverageMTA • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

MTA

57%flagged-word coverage
102 attributed words100% of attributed speech36% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Politically Left Leaning B-14.3 ptsWriter: 14.3%MTA: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%MTA: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.