Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mta results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 2,452 hits . Analysis detected 18,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,989 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (8,067 of 16,562 topics). This Mta is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Mta
Topic details
Total words: 12,989
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst