Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clayton Guse results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 2,947 hits . Analysis detected 18,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,525 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,489 of 6,358 authors). This Clayton Guse is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group. Clayton Guse
Author details
Total words: 15,525
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.0% 19.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst