Fox News89%

Americans turned Christmas dinner into patriotic duty during WWI with wartime recipes86%

By Deirdre Bardolf0%

12/20/2025, 4:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 59.6% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 770 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.3% and a BS Rank of 86% (3,099 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the article peer group.

When Americans sat down to Christmas dinner in 1918, the meal wasn't just a celebration  it was an act of patriotism. 
During World War I, the U.S. Food Administration urged households to save wheat, sugar, meat and fats so more food could be shipped to troops overseas  and it backed a cookbook, "Win the War in the Kitchen," filled with ration-friendly recipes. 
Today, the National WWI Museum and Memorial in Kansas City preserves that cookbook through its online exhibit, "War Fare: From the Home Front to the Frontlines." 
"Everyone must help if we are to win," the cookbook declared. 
"Fats are the most precious thing in this war," it added, noting the Army needed them both to feed soldiers and produce glycerin for explosives. 
Even sugar mattered: "Saving that ounce a day is part of YOUR WAR SERVICE." 
The cookbook drew contributions from food companies, American Red Cross dietitians, women's auxiliaries and magazines of the era  with endorsements from figures like Herbert Hoover, then head of the U.S. Food Administration, and President Woodrow Wilson. 
It was driven by patriotism, said Lora Vogt, the museum's vice president of education and interpretation. 
Christmas still called for dishes that felt special. 
"Hoover helped lead the nation, not by saying, 'The government is mandating this,' but instead, 'Each of you American families get the opportunity to support our nation and support American ideals by changing how you eat,'" Vogt told Fox News Digital. 
While wartime substitutions like carrot coffee, soybean loaf and calls to "make every day a fish day" filled everyday meals, Christmas still called for dishes that felt special. 
Below are seven dishes that would have appeared on some 1918 American Christmas tables. 
1. Relish tray 
Before charcuterie boards dominated social media, the centerpiece of a holiday table was the relish tray, full of pickles, celery, carrots, olives, nuts and fruit. 
The offerings were inexpensive, relied on preserved foods and required no wheat, meat or sugar. 
2. Maple syrup cake with maple icing 
The cookbook noted American sugar consumption and encouraged home cooks to skip frostings and instead sweeten cakes with maple syrup, honey or molasses. 
A maple syrup cake with maple icing was a festive, ration-friendly workaround. 
3. Corn fritters 
Corn fritters appear in the WWI cookbook as an example of a simple, wheat-saving side. 
"Millions of people get along very well who never taste wheat. 
It won't hurt us to do with less wheat," the book said. 
Vogt said the recipe is still useful today: "If you come home from work one day, and you're like, 'I have nothing to cook,' you can pull that together in no time." 
4. Buckwheat chocolate cake 
Buckwheat, rye, cornmeal and oatmeal were promoted as alternatives to flour, and the WWI cookbook urged families to rethink how they baked. 
The buckwheat chocolate cake offered a real treat while still honoring the conservation message, and Vogt has even made them as muffins: "I can genuinely attest  they're solid," she said. 
5. Puritan turkey stuffing 
The cookbook's Puritan stuffing didn't call for any actual turkey meat  only turkey fat. 
Made from cornmeal, oatmeal, stale bread, chopped nuts and turkey drippings, the stuffing was designed to be economical and celebratory. 
As Americans prepare to celebrate the nation's 250th year, the recipes offer a look back at a traditional holiday menu  one with plenty of elements that still feel familiar today, Vogt noted. 
6. Meat: possum, tongue and mallard 
During the WWI era, some meats were more practical, regional and even celebratory. 
The cookbook included meats from chicken and turkey to venison, rabbit and squab, while some families served possum, tongue or wild duck. 
Cookbooks from the early 1900s showed the "beautiful intersection of the fantastic tapestry that is America," reflected in the meats that appeared on holiday tables as families relied on regional and cultural traditions and made use of every part of the animal, Vogt said. 
7. Plum pudding 
The spirit of the Sugar Plum Fairy still found its way onto WWI tables, as plum pudding remained one of the era's most beloved Christmas desserts. 
Households relied heavily on dried fruits like prunes, raisins and dates. 
"While the ingredients and the making of the meal were important, it was about the memories that were made  who you were bringing around the table," Vogt said. 
She added that American soldiers abroad were eating whatever was available overseas  sometimes even snails in Paris and donuts from Salvation Army tents, as one soldier wrote in letters preserved in the museum’s archives. 
Deirdre Bardolf is a lifestyle writer with Fox News Digital. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Deirdre Bardolf: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias7.5%This article: 12.7%Deirdre Bardolf: 10.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic12.7%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.1%Deirdre Bardolf: 3.9%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias12.1%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 59.6%Deirdre Bardolf: 39.4%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect59.6%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 10.1%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Deirdre Bardolf: 4.2%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 17.2%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 1.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 2.1%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Deirdre Bardolf: 5.9%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 4.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 6.1%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Deirdre Bardolf: 14.8%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 14.2%Deirdre Bardolf: 9.5%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal14.2%This article: 46.1%Deirdre Bardolf: 20.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority46.1%This article: 21.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 24.2%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion21.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.9%Deirdre Bardolf: 5.7%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.9%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.3%Deirdre Bardolf: 2.9%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma5.3%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 5.9%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Deirdre Bardolf: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%

770 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.