Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,749 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Drink results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 1,204 hits . Analysis detected 5,401 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,268 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,182 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Drink is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Food Drink
Keyword details
Total words: 4,268
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.5% percentile 5.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 28.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst