Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deirdre Bardolf results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.4% saturation with 1,265 hits. Analysis detected 6,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,214 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (462 of 6,226 authors). This Deirdre Bardolf is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Deirdre Bardolf
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
93%Deirdre Bardolf (selected)9%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,214
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
8.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 14.8%14.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 39.4%39.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 24.2%24.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.5%9.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.9%3.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 39.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 20.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 10.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos