Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deirdre Bardolf results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.4% saturation with 1,265 hits . Analysis detected 6,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,214 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (462 of 6,226 authors). This Deirdre Bardolf is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Deirdre Bardolf
Author details
Total words: 3,214
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.6% percentile 8.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 14.8% 14.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 39.4% 39.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 24.2% 24.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 39.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 20.0%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst