Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dinner results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 1,064 hits. Analysis detected 4,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,379 of 16,562 topics). This Dinner is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Dinner
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,310
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510091.7% percentile
9.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 46.1%46.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.4%24.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 26.6%26.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 46.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos