Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American Cuisine results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,207 hits . Analysis detected 10,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,982 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,537 of 16,562 topics). This American Cuisine is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. American Cuisine
Topic details
Total words: 8,982
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst