Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chason Gordon results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 750 hits . Analysis detected 6,411 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,507 of 6,277 authors). This Chason Gordon is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Chason Gordon
Author details
Total words: 6,672
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst