Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cookbooks results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 2,618 hits. Analysis detected 12,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,567 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,568 of 37,536 keywords). This Cookbooks is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Cookbooks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
91%Cookbooks (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,567
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
7.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 24.4%24.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 39.9%39.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 18.3%18.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 14.5%14.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.9%19.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 39.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos