Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dinner results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 1,064 hits . Analysis detected 4,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,059 of 37,536 keywords). This Dinner is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group. Dinner
Keyword details
Total words: 2,310
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.5% percentile 9.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 46.1% 46.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 24.4% 24.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 26.6% 26.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 46.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst