Topic summary
61%4 analyzed articles/videos1,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workplace Safety results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 774 hits. Analysis detected 5,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,174 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,210 of 16,302 topics). This Workplace Safety is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Workplace Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate