Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Priyanka Dayal McCluskey results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 213 hits . Analysis detected 1,180 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,393 authors). This Priyanka Dayal McCluskey is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Priyanka Dayal McCluskey
Author details
Total words: 1,296
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst