Nurses at SLU Hospital claim better staffing could have prevented a tragedy95%

By Sarah Fentem57%

12/24/2025, 9:14:31 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 68.5% saturation with 235 hits. Analysis detected 1,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 343 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.3% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,089 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the article peer group.

Union nurses say inadequate staffing at SSM Health St. Louis University Hospital is a safety issue. 
About a dozen employees represented by National Nurses United/National Nurses Organizing Committee rallied Tuesday night outside the emergency department entrance at the hospital on South Grand. 
The union has long argued that nurses are responsible for too many patients. 
Union representatives said greater staffing may have been able to prevent the death last month of a person from a self-inflicted gunshot wound in the hospital’s emergency department. 
“Maybe the tragedy a month ago wouldn't have happened,” said Larry Voiles, an registered nurse who works at the hospital. 
“They would have seen that the person was depressed beforehand. 
But if they're so short-staffed in the ER that the nurses sometimes [have] got three times as many patients they should have.” 
SSM Health representatives have pushed back, saying the nurses are taking advantage of an isolated case. 
“SSM Health is deeply disappointed that the NNOC has chosen to exploit a tragic event to advance its own agenda,” a spokeswoman said in an email. 
“Their approach, unfortunately, reflects a pattern we’ve seen from the NNOC across the country.” 
The health system said it continues to discuss concerns with its staff “not through rallies or publicity, but through genuine dialogue, support and commitment to excellence.” 
The hospital’s union representative, nurse Kellie Allen, said workers are pushing not only for improved nurse-to-patient staffing ratios, but also for better security measures at the hospital. 
Allen said the union would like to see charge nurses, who assign patients to other nurses and otherwise supervise workers on the floor, to be relieved of caring for patients during shifts. 
Nurses said they had seen increases in safety measures since the November death, with more security guards rounding the building. 
But Allen said staffing issues continue to put workers at risk. 
“The more staff you have, the better you have an intervention and you can deescalate situations,” she said. 
“It's unacceptable. 
We are held to a high standard, as SSM should be held to a high standard.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Sarah Fentem: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 18.1%Sarah Fentem: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias18.1%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Sarah Fentem: 6.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect7.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 16.9%Sarah Fentem: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias16.9%This article: 16.3%Sarah Fentem: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect16.3%This article: 68.5%Sarah Fentem: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias68.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 28.9%Sarah Fentem: 6.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias28.9%This article: 5.2%Sarah Fentem: 4.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias5.2%This article: 16.3%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias16.3%This article: 2.9%Sarah Fentem: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias2.9%This article: 14.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Sarah Fentem: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 24.5%Sarah Fentem: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias24.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.2%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem12.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 3.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 4.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 12.2%Sarah Fentem: 6.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion12.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.6%Sarah Fentem: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma7.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.3%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy16.3%This article: 10.5%Sarah Fentem: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization10.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 16.9%Sarah Fentem: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.9%This article: 12.2%Sarah Fentem: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring12.2%This article: 13.4%Sarah Fentem: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope13.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Fentem: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

343 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.