Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nurses Union results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 335 hits. Analysis detected 2,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,029 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,984 of 37,536 keywords). This Nurses Union is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Nurses Union
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
95%Nurses Union (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,029
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

95% percentile
025507510094.7% percentile
9.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 32.6%32.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 31.2%31.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.0%17.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Keyword 32.6%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 31.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos