Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nurses Union results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 335 hits . Analysis detected 2,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,029 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,984 of 37,536 keywords). This Nurses Union is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Nurses Union
Keyword details
Total words: 1,029
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.7% percentile 9.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 32.6% 32.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 31.2% 31.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Keyword 32.6%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 31.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 7.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst