Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hospital Staffing results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 489 hits . Analysis detected 4,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,409 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,201 of 16,562 topics). This Hospital Staffing is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Hospital Staffing
Topic details
Total words: 3,409
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst