Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emergency Department results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 335 hits . Analysis detected 2,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,029 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,327 of 16,562 topics). This Emergency Department is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group. Emergency Department
Topic details
Total words: 1,029
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.0% percentile 9.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 32.6% 32.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 16.9% 16.9% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 31.2% 31.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.0% 17.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Topic 32.6%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 31.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 7.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Horn Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst