Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Unions results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 733 hits . Analysis detected 5,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,481 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,727 of 16,562 topics). This Unions is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Unions
Topic details
Total words: 5,481
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst