Topic summary
⁠24%2 analyzed articles/videos3,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workplace Diversity results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 2,521 hits. Analysis detected 13,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,073 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,601 of 16,562 topics). This Workplace Diversity is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group.
Workplace Diversity
Topic details
Total words: 23,073
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles23.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos