Topic summary
78% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women's Health results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,363 hits . Analysis detected 9,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,123 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,908 of 16,562 topics). This Women's Health is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Women's Health
Topic details
Total words: 9,123
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst