Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,060 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Thebe results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 267 hits . Analysis detected 1,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,538 of 6,628 authors). This Amanda Thebe is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Amanda Thebe
Author details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Tu Quoque: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst