Small Achievable Goals: What menopause at work actually looks like right now 10%

By Amanda Thebe0%

1/12/2026, 2:08:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 2,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,060 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,192 of 21,172 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the article peer group.

Ten years ago, when I first started talking publicly about menopause, we simply weren’t having meaningful conversations about it  anywhere. 
Not socially. 
Not medically. 
And certainly not in the workplace. 
Most women were left to quietly navigate symptoms while trying to stay afloat, often assuming they were the problem. 
Fast forward to today and something has shifted: Over the past decade, menopause has slowly but unmistakably entered the mainstream. 
We’re talking about it more openly, more honestly, and in more places, including at work. 
Women started talking, awkwardly and quietly, in corridors, over coffee, in the ladies’ loos. 
And then those conversations began to ripple outward. 
I know that I was nervous about saying menopause out loud at first, but once the cat was out of the bag, I realised it was easy, natural and necessary. 
I work extensively with organisations, leaders, and employees, helping workplaces understand what menopause actually looks like in real life  not just in theory or in policy documents  and how it affects women and the organisations they work for. 
Knowledge gives women agency and menopause is one of those life phases where knowledge really does matter, because it often arrives earlier, louder and more unpredictably than expected. 
According to the Menopause Foundation of Canada, there are more than 2 million working women in Canada between the ages of 45 and 55. 
Two thirds of those women surveyed said they would not feel comfortable talking with their supervisor or HR about menopause-related issues. 
Meanwhile, unmanaged symptoms impact the economy in a big way, costing companies an estimated $237 million in lost productivity and cost women over $3 billion in lost income each year. 
Menopause may even be a factor in the relative lack of women in senior leadership roles. 
While policies matter, real change rarely starts there. 
It starts at the grassroots level, with those small conversations. 
That’s why CBC’s Small Achievable Goals resonates so deeply with me. 
The show reveals how social change really happens  not through grand declarations, but through honest, often awkward conversations that signal something bigger is stirring. 
Awareness is growing but culture is still catching up 
Menopause awareness is driven through community conversations, pop culture moments and shows like Small Achievable Goals, which gently but powerfully bring women’s lived experiences into the mainstream. 
I recently spoke with co-creators and stars Jennifer Whalen and Meredith MacNeill who reflected on their show’s impact. 
“It opened the doors for women to be able to talk about things they hadn’t previously been able to talk about,” shared Whalen. 
What I love most about the show is its refusal to sensationalize midlife. 
Instead, it normalizes it. 
Through humour, vulnerability and the relationship between lead characters Kris and Julie, it shows how conversations can open up, not because anyone has the answers, but because someone finally says, “this is happening to me too!” 
In my own circles, Small Achievable Goals has sparked exactly the kind of conversations we need more of. 
Women recognize themselves. 
Laugh at moments that are painfully familiar. 
They cringe or cry because the awkwardness hits close to home. 
I still find myself deeply affected by how often women’s stories echo one another. 
When I asked women in my network about their workplace experiences, their responses reflected this same mix of progress and pain. 
Many Gen X women arrived in perimenopause with no roadmap whatsoever. 
One woman told me: “My mum died young so the only reference I had was Kitty Forman in That ’70s Show throwing wild tantrums, which was funny in context, but didn’t portray menopause accurately as the all-encompassing series of changes your body and mind go through.” 
Menopause at work: awareness without understanding 
The workplace has quietly become the modern version of the church hall or wash-house, places where women once gathered to share stories and wisdom. 
Knowledge gives women agency and menopause is one of those life phases where knowledge really does matter, because it often arrives earlier, louder and more unpredictably than expected. 
And yet, awareness without understanding can still cause harm. 
Menopause, aging and sexism are deeply intertwined. 
Even well-intentioned jokes can diminish women, reinforcing the idea that menopause makes us less capable or less professional. 
One woman shared: “There are throw-away comments about menobrain or memory lapses. 
I also witnessed a senior staff member suggest a colleague’s low mood ‘could be the menopause’ during a work discussion.” 
Many senior leaders genuinely want to support their female employees, but good intentions don’t always translate into good outcomes. 
Then sometimes, workplace menopause conversations are mishandled entirely: “During winter I cracked a window for relief. 
The principal (a woman) told me I was wasting energy. 
So I wore sleeveless tops instead, and was chastised for dressing inappropriately. 
When I explained, she told me menopause wasn’t real. 
She was older than me.” 
That sting is familiar to many women. 
A lack of compassion from male bosses can feel predictable, but it can hit harder when it comes from another woman. 
Says another commenter in my network: “During the HRT shortage, I explained to my boss that my brain fog was severe. 
I was told my job was too important and I just needed to try harder. 
She was menopausal too.” 
Perhaps it shouldn’t surprise us. 
Many women experience a lack of workplace support during pregnancy. 
It stands to reason that when perimenopause rolls around, the pattern repeats, different life stages, same structural blind spots. 
Grassroots change and small achievable goals 
So what do these stories tell us? 
Well to start with, allyship matters because menopause impacts us all (just ask my husband!). 
This is one of many angles Small Achievable Goals gets right. 
Women have been inspired to share their personal stories, says MacNeill. 
“I found it extremely moving, that they felt safe enough and proud enough to say, ‘this is what Kris and Julie went through’ and this is my experience.” 
That gap between awareness and understanding is closing. 
And we close it through small, achievable actions  conversations that widen the ripple effect. 
Moving away from ageist and sexist tropes can propel us forward into policy change and create compassionate environments where women are supported, respected and retained. 
Small achievable goals. 
That’s how real change shows up. 
Watch now on CBC Gem. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.3%Amanda Thebe: 2.9%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.6%Amanda Thebe: 2.8%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic15.6%This article: 2.1%Amanda Thebe: 0.8%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.1%This article: 0.5%Amanda Thebe: 1.0%CBC: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.5%This article: 6.2%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias6.2%This article: 6.5%Amanda Thebe: 2.1%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 2.8%Amanda Thebe: 0.9%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion2.8%This article: 2.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 0.3%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.3%This article: 11.2%Amanda Thebe: 3.4%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias11.2%This article: 1.5%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias1.5%This article: 17.8%Amanda Thebe: 1.1%CBC: 5.6%Negativity Bias17.8%This article: 4.2%Amanda Thebe: 0.9%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 1.8%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error1.8%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Amanda Thebe: 1.0%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias2.0%This article: 0.5%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.5%This article: 3.3%Amanda Thebe: 2.0%CBC: 3.7%Halo Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.2%Amanda Thebe: 1.3%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority9.2%This article: 3.7%Amanda Thebe: 0.3%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 1.8%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope1.8%This article: 6.7%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning6.7%This article: 21.6%Amanda Thebe: 8.3%CBC: 4.9%Hasty Generalization21.6%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.9%Amanda Thebe: 1.1%CBC: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion17.9%This article: 0.6%Amanda Thebe: 1.8%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question0.6%This article: 18.9%Amanda Thebe: 0.5%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.9%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.1%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.7%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.7%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.3%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division2.3%This article: 42.2%Amanda Thebe: 8.4%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal42.2%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.7%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.7%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.8%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.8%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.2%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote2.2%This article: 1.5%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 5.6%Amanda Thebe: 1.7%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice5.6%This article: 7.6%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination7.6%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda Thebe: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Amanda Thebe: 0.3%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.9%

1060 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers8.6%attributed speech969writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMenopause Foundation of Canada • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Whalen • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageMeredith MacNeill • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMeredith MacNeill • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageCBC Gem • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jennifer Whalen

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words25% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jennifer Whalen: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-8.4 ptsWriter: 8.4%Jennifer Whalen: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Jennifer Whalen: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Jennifer Whalen: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Jennifer Whalen: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.