Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workplace results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,205 hits . Analysis detected 10,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,768 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (26,012 of 35,668 keywords). This Workplace is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Workplace
Keyword details
Total words: 11,768
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst