Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Small Achievable Goals results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 534 hits. Analysis detected 4,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,376 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,574 of 37,536 keywords). This Small Achievable Goals is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Small Achievable Goals
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
24%Small Achievable Goals (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,376
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos