Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Whalen results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 353 hits. Analysis detected 3,452 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (2,447 of 6,620 authors). This Jennifer Whalen is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Jennifer Whalen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠63%Jennifer Whalen (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,196
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.7%9.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos