Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,067 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lynn Arditi results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion , Framing Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 1,224 hits . Analysis detected 5,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,201 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 92% (534 of 6,532 authors). This Lynn Arditi is worse (more manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group. Lynn Arditi
Author details
Total words: 3,201
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.8% percentile 7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 35.4% 35.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 38.2% 38.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 14.8% 14.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.4% 19.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 38.2%, sitewide 19.2% Loss Aversion: Author 35.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect: Author 19.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst