Topic summary
⁠66%4 analyzed articles/videos1,601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Risk results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 2,099 hits. Analysis detected 10,017 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,771 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,037 of 15,984 topics). This Wildfire Risk is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.3%16.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.9%23.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos