Topic summary
⁠44%4 analyzed articles/videos1,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Visit results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,035 hits. Analysis detected 8,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,167 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,785 of 16,562 topics). This White House Visit is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
White House Visit
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.4%14.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos