Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whca Dinner Shooting results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 426 hits. Analysis detected 2,665 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,095 of 15,710 topics). This Whca Dinner Shooting is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Whca Dinner Shooting
Topic details
Total words: 3,260
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos