Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wellbeing results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,458 hits . Analysis detected 24,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,203 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,019 of 16,442 topics). This Wellbeing is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Wellbeing
Topic details
Total words: 33,203
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles33.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst