Topic summary
⁠36%2 analyzed articles/videos1,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weather Phenomena results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 2,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,687 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,785 of 16,559 topics). This Weather Phenomena is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Weather Phenomena
Topic details
Total words: 3,687
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos