Author summary
15% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,828 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Ballard results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 323 hits . Analysis detected 2,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,484 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,560 of 6,215 authors). This Justin Ballard is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Justin Ballard
Author details
Total words: 5,484
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst