Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Weapons Of Mass Destruction results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 2,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,120 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,399 topics). This Weapons Of Mass Destruction is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.7%24.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.8%21.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.7%28.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 10.0%10.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 31.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 10.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate