Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wall-Street results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Status Quo Bias, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 346 hits. Analysis detected 3,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,655 of 15,757 topics). This Wall-Street is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Wall-Street
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.8%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos